A roll is not an exit. It is a new trade wearing the old one’s name.
Rolling is a legitimate tactic. What it is not is a way to avoid a loss — the loss happened when you bought the position back. Everything after that is a new decision, and it deserves to be judged on its own merits rather than on the hope of rescuing the last one.
No. Rolling a tested strategy under a stated rule is fine. Rolling because you don’t want to book the loss is the problem, and only one of those two can be written into a specification.
No. The credit is what you were paid for taking on a new position. The old one closed at whatever it closed at, and that result stands.
As separate trades, with the roll condition specified in advance. Anything else makes the trade count and the win rate meaningless.
Close enough for this purpose. Both change the position rather than ending it, and both need to be recorded as new trades if the results are going to mean anything.
No roll result is published yet.
When one runs, rolled positions will be reported as separate trades with the roll rule stated — and the strategy’s numbers will be shown both with and without them, because the difference between those two views is the whole point of this entry.