| Number | What it sets | What happens if you leave it out |
|---|---|---|
| Delta | How far from the money you sell | The most commonly stated one, so this rarely happens |
| Tenor | How many days you give it | Also usually stated |
| Width | How far apart the strikes are — and therefore the maximum loss | Your software picks one, and you never chose it |
| Minimum credit | The least you will accept for that risk | You take whatever is offered, including trades that were never worth it |
Take the spread this site uses as its worked example: sell the 95 put, buy the 90, 45 days out. Two of the four numbers are in that sentence.
A result without its specification is not a result. It is an anecdote with a number in it.
Because width and minimum credit together are the risk-to-reward, and a strategy quoted without them cannot be priced. Delta and tenor alone describe a location, not a trade.
The four are the credit-spread set. A covered call needs the call's delta, the tenor and the assignment rule; a calendar needs both expiries. The principle is the same: name everything that changes the trade.
Then that is your specification and it should be stated. “No minimum” is a legitimate choice; leaving it unsaid is not.
Yes, and it is the part most often left out. It moves the result more than the entry does.
Every test on this site prints its specification above the numbers — all four numbers, the universe, the period, the exit and the cost assumptions.
No result is published yet. The specifications are already there, written before the runs, which is the only order in which they mean anything.